In Context
- Recently, Election Management Bodies (EMBs) expressed their expectation from social media sites to proactively flag fake news.
More about the news
- International conference for EMBs:
- The Chief Election Commissioner was addressing an international conference for EMBs hosted by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
- The conference was held under the aegis of the United States’ ‘Summit for Democracy’ platform.
- The Chief Election Commissioner was addressing an international conference for EMBs hosted by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
- Chief Election Commissioner on managing fake news:
- He stated that Election management bodies (EMBs) expected social media sites to use their “algorithm power” to proactively flag fake news.
- He said social media platforms proclaim to have content policies but added that they do also have such “algorithm power”.
- According to him, a proactive approach by these platforms to counter fake news would facilitate “credible electoral outcomes”.
- He stated that Election management bodies (EMBs) expected social media sites to use their “algorithm power” to proactively flag fake news.
Summit for Democracy
|
More about the Fake News
- Fake news, broadly termed as false news or misinformation disguised as credible news, which is very persuasive and has serious consequences for democracy.
Effects
- Influencing opinions: It can be used to influence public opinions, to gain popularity or to malign the image, character of certain individuals or opponents or to defame them.
- Issue of fake news during elections: During the 2016 US Presidential elections, a bipartisan Senate committee found that before and after the 2016 election, the Russian government used social media advertising to spread misinformation and conspiracy theories.
- On similar lines, there has been talk of Facebook interfering with India’s electoral democracy.
- Disturbing harmony:
- It affects social & communal harmony by spreading extremists’ ideologies especially in sensitive areas like radicalization of youths, inciting violence and hatred among the communities, swinging public opinions etc.
- No standard definition:
- Lack of regulation:
Legal remedies to tackle fake news
- Indian Broadcast Foundation (IBF):
- The Press Council of India:
- IPC Sections 153A and 295: .
- Broadcasting Content Complaint Council (BCCC):
- Defamation Suit:
- The Information Technology (IT) Act:
- Contempt of Court laws:
- Constitution:
Way ahead
- Policy-makers: Although the policy-makers’ steps and regulations are in the right direction, the existing loopholes need to be filled.
- All the stakeholders- lawmakers, online intermediaries, and citizens have a collective responsibility to curb fake news.
- Lawmakers: While lawmakers can keep amending the laws, the citizens’ duty lies to gain awareness about media literacy.
- Online intermediaries: On the other hand, tech platforms need to ensure the use of a sophisticated algorithm to present the public with correct, accurate, and truthful information.
Citizens: The responsibility lies equally among the general public to educate with the necessary information to critically analyze information and then make deductive conclusions.