Tribal Groups Seek Dissolution of FRA and PESA Task Forces

Syllabus: GS2/Polity and Governance

Context

• The constitution of a task force in Chhattisgarh to fast-track the implementation of laws such as the Forest Rights Act, 2006 and the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, has led to controversy. 

About

• The task force was constituted to map potential areas for community forest resource rights claims under the FRA, reviewing pending claims, design strategies for PESA-related matters, and assist district authorities with implementation of the FRA.
• Critics argue that these task forces subvert the basic democratic structure of implementation of PESA and FRA as the creation of task forces moves decision-making power away from village institutions and towards administrative and technical mechanisms.
  • Adivasi and forest rights groups have called for the dissolution of task forces on FRA and PESA in Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh.

Forest Rights Act

• The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (Forest Rights Act or FRA) was introduced to recognize the rights of forest-dwelling communities, including Scheduled Tribes, over forest resources that they have been traditionally using.

Major Highlights:

• Recognition of Rights: It includes individual and community rights such as Self-cultivation, Habitation, Grazing, Fishing and access to Water bodies in forests.
  • It also includes Habitat Rights for PVTGs, Traditional Seasonal Resource access of Nomadic and Pastoral communities, access to biodiversity, community right to intellectual property and traditional knowledge. 
• Allocation of Forest Land: It also provides rights to allocation of forest land for developmental purposes to fulfil basic infrastructural needs of the community.
  • In conjunction with the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Settlement Act, 2013 FRA protects the tribal population from eviction without rehabilitation and settlement.
• Role of Gram Sabha: The Act further enjoins upon the Gram Sabha and rights holders the responsibility of conservation and protection of forests.
  • The Gram Sabha is also a highly empowered body under the Act, enabling the tribal population to have a decisive say in the determination of local policies and schemes impacting them.

What is the PESA Act, 1996?

• PESA Act, 1996 stands for the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996.
• It is a law enacted by the Parliament to extend the provisions of Part IX of the Constitution relating to the Panchayats to the 5th Scheduled Areas in a slightly modified form.
• Under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, regions with predominantly tribal populations are categorized as ‘Scheduled Areas’, a territorial designation that recognises the customary rights of the Scheduled Tribes (ST).

How has the PESA Act boosted forest conservation?

• Control Over Natural Resources: The Act grants tribal communities control over the management and utilization of natural resources, such as land, water, and forests. 
• Decentralized Decision-Making: The  Act decentralizes decision-making to the Gram Sabha and Panchayats, enabling more localized and contextually relevant governance. 
• Land Rights and Preventing Alienation: By requiring that any transfer of land in Scheduled Areas must be approved by the Gram Sabha, the PESA Act provides legal safeguards against the alienation of tribal lands.

Way Ahead

• Strengthen Gram Sabha-Centric Governance: Ensure that implementation of the FRA, 2006 and PESA, 1996 remains rooted in the authority of Gram Sabhas, as envisaged by the laws. Task forces should play a facilitative role rather than a decision-making role.
• Institutionalize Participatory Decision-Making: Include representatives of tribal communities, traditional forest dwellers, women’s groups, and civil society organizations in advisory and monitoring mechanisms.
• Enhance Transparency and Accountability: Publish regular reports on claims processed, rights recognized, and implementation status.
  • Establish independent grievance redressal mechanisms accessible to tribal communities.
• Adopt Cooperative Federal and Constitutional Approaches: States should frame rules and implementation strategies consistent with constitutional protections under the Fifth Schedule and the spirit of tribal self-governance.

Conclusion

• Effective implementation of FRA and PESA requires balancing administrative efficiency with constitutional principles of tribal self-governance. 
• Strengthening Gram Sabhas, ensuring community participation, and making task forces accountable to local institutions can help achieve both development and democratic empowerment in Scheduled Areas.

Source: TH