In News
The Supreme Court has alleged the Government of delaying Collegium recommendations on the appointment of judges to High Courts.
What are the fallouts of such steps by the executive?
- High Courts with skeletal judicial strength
- Delhi High Court will be with less than 50% judges in August 2021, having only 29 judges out of a strength of 60 judges.
- Delayed adjudication of commercial disputes
- As this observation of SC came during a anti-dumping proceedings, SC observed it will hamper business litigation
- Delayed Governance:
- It will also create problems in the smooth functioning of government as the government, itself, is one of the largest litigants in India.
- Pending Cases
- The number of pending cases is too high (around 57 lakh as per National Judicial Data Grid)
|
What is the Collegium System?
What are constitutional Provisions backing it?
Role of Government in Judicial Appointment
|
What is its importance in Democracy?
- Participatory consultative process
- In 1993, the second judges case held the process of appointment of Judges to the SC and the HCs as an integrated ‘participatory consultative process’.
- The aim is to select the best and most suitable persons available for appointment.
- All the constitutional functionaries must perform this duty collectively with a view primarily to reach an agreed decision.
- In 1993, the second judges case held the process of appointment of Judges to the SC and the HCs as an integrated ‘participatory consultative process’.
- Adherence to Highest Democratic Ethical Principles:
- Judges, in general, have shown adherence to highest ethical and moral conduct.
- They display attributes essential for making an able, independent and fearless judge.
- Further they had “legal expertise, ability to handle cases, proper personal conduct and ethical behaviour, firmness and fearlessness.
- Many new people friendly innovations:
- Indian judiciary has developed multiple instruments like Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to uphold the democratic value of Justice for all.
- Further multiple directive related to police reforms, triple talaq, Mob lynching later became the well accepted laws.
Way Ahead
- Opaqueness.
- There is a lack of transparency and few allege how the whims and fancies of a few judges decide the fate of the whole Indian judiciary.
- Scope for nepotism.
- There are many judges who are kith and kins of former judges ignoring merit.
- Embroilment in public controversies.
- Juniors of Delhi High Court Judges were elevated to superior positions which raised eyebrows.
- Overlooks several talented junior judges and advocates.
- It demotivates the state judicial services judges and thus violates merit.
Source: TH
Previous article
Facts in News
Next article
Microplastics in Goa tap water samples: Study