{"id":31018,"date":"2024-10-18T17:55:44","date_gmt":"2024-10-18T12:25:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/?p=31018"},"modified":"2024-10-18T17:55:45","modified_gmt":"2024-10-18T12:25:45","slug":"feasibility-of-gram-nyayalayas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/current-affairs\/18-10-2024\/feasibility-of-gram-nyayalayas","title":{"rendered":"Feasibility of Gram Nyayalayas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Syllabus :GS 2\/Governance&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>In News<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Supreme Court questioned the practicality of establishing Gram Nyayalayas given the inadequate infrastructure of regular courts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>About Gram Nyayalayas<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Law Commission of India proposed the establishment of <strong>Gram Nyayalayas in its 114th Report <\/strong>to ensure affordable and quick access to justice for rural citizens.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The Gram Nyayalayas Act <\/strong>was enacted on October 2, <strong>2009<\/strong>, applying throughout India except\u00a0 in certain northeastern states and specified tribal areas.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Act does not apply to Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, and certain tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Key Features and Objectives:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Location: <\/strong>Headquarters at the intermediate Panchayat; Nyayadhikaris may visit villages to hear cases.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Accessibility<\/strong>: Designed to provide inexpensive justice at the doorstep of rural communities.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Establishment<\/strong>: Set up for each intermediate Panchayat or groups of contiguous Panchayats, located at their headquarters.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Procedures<\/strong>: Handle specified civil and criminal cases using a summary procedure, with an emphasis on conciliation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Flexibility<\/strong>: Not strictly bound by the Indian Evidence Act, guided by natural justice principles.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Challenges\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Feasibility Concerns<\/strong>: The Supreme Court questioned the practicality of establishing gram nyayalayas given the<strong> inadequate infrastructure <\/strong>of regular courts.\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Only about 314 out of a targeted 2,500 gram nyayalayas are operational across India.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Funding Issues:<\/strong> State governments struggle to fund existing courts, making it unlikely they can support additional rural courts.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Limited Effectiveness:<\/strong> Concerns were raised about the effectiveness of gram nyayalayas, as some magistrates handle very few cases (e.g., one in Karnataka managed only 116 cases in four years).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Potential Burden on Higher Courts<\/strong>: The court warned that establishing these rural courts might lead to an increase in appeals and writ petitions in high courts, counteracting the intended purpose of declogging district courts.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Suggestions\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The\u00a0 Supreme Court suggested increasing the number of regular courts and judicial officers, rather than establishing more gram nyayalayas.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The court proposed that the establishment of gram nyayalayas should be based on specific state needs rather than a uniform mandate across all states.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Source :HT<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court questioned the practicality of establishing Gram Nyayalayas given the inadequate infrastructure of regular courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-affairs"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31018"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31019,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31018\/revisions\/31019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nextias.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}